<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Canon EF 70-200 L to buy ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adidap.com/2006/08/27/which-canon-70-200-l-to-buy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adidap.com/2006/08/27/which-canon-70-200-l-to-buy/</link>
	<description>your daily dose of photography</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Which Canon EF 70-200 L to buy - The Answer - &#124; All Day I Dream About Photography</title>
		<link>http://www.adidap.com/2006/08/27/which-canon-70-200-l-to-buy/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Which Canon EF 70-200 L to buy - The Answer - &#124; All Day I Dream About Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adidap.com/2006/08/27/which-canon-70-200-l-to-buy/#comment-191</guid>
		<description>[...] Which Canon EF 70-200 L to buy - The Answer -      Two days ago and after the announcement of the new 70-200 L f/4 IS I was confused and was wondering which of the 4 Canon lenses should I buy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Which Canon EF 70-200 L to buy - The Answer -      Two days ago and after the announcement of the new 70-200 L f/4 IS I was confused and was wondering which of the 4 Canon lenses should I buy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoine Khater</title>
		<link>http://www.adidap.com/2006/08/27/which-canon-70-200-l-to-buy/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoine Khater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 21:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adidap.com/2006/08/27/which-canon-70-200-l-to-buy/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Very  interesting link, thanks for the tip...
if you check http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082414canon70-200f4lens.asp it CLEARLY states 4 stops IS, guess we will have to wait and see</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very  interesting link, thanks for the tip&#8230;<br />
if you check <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082414canon70-200f4lens.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082414canon70-200f4lens.asp</a> it CLEARLY states 4 stops IS, guess we will have to wait and see</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muppie</title>
		<link>http://www.adidap.com/2006/08/27/which-canon-70-200-l-to-buy/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>muppie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 21:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adidap.com/2006/08/27/which-canon-70-200-l-to-buy/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Canon's web site says the 70-200 L F/4 IS USM only offers 3 stops faster.... the same as what it says on F/2.8

http://www.canon.com.au/products/visual/cameras_lenses_accessories/telephoto_zoom_lenses/ef_70-200mm4lisusm.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon&#8217;s web site says the 70-200 L F/4 IS USM only offers 3 stops faster&#8230;. the same as what it says on F/2.8</p>
<p><a href="http://www.canon.com.au/products/visual/cameras_lenses_accessories/telephoto_zoom_lenses/ef_70-200mm4lisusm.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.canon.com.au/products/visual/cameras_lenses_accessories/telephoto_zoom_lenses/ef_70-200mm4lisusm.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoine Khater</title>
		<link>http://www.adidap.com/2006/08/27/which-canon-70-200-l-to-buy/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoine Khater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adidap.com/2006/08/27/which-canon-70-200-l-to-buy/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gmariusica</title>
		<link>http://www.adidap.com/2006/08/27/which-canon-70-200-l-to-buy/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>gmariusica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adidap.com/2006/08/27/which-canon-70-200-l-to-buy/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>67mm filters size on Canon EF 70-200 f4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>67mm filters size on Canon EF 70-200 f4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
